Doubt
From Wikinfo
- Note that Original research is acceptable on Wikinfo.
- This article contains significant unique material and should not be replaced by an imported or updated Wikipedia article.
- For criticism see Criticism of Doubt
Doubt, a status between belief and disbelief, involves uncertainty or distrust or lack of sureness of an alleged fact, an action, a motive, or a decision. Doubt brings into question some notion of a perceived "reality", and may involve delaying or rejecting relevant action out of concerns for mistakes or faults or appropriateness. Some definitions of doubt emphasize the state in which the mind remains suspended between two contradictory propositions and unable to assent to either of them[1] (compare paradox).
The concept of doubt covers a range of phenomena: one can characterise both deliberate questioning of uncertainties and an emotional state of indecision as "doubt".
The term "to doubt" can also mean "to question one's circumstances and life-experience".
| Certainty series |
|---|
Contents |
Impact on society
Doubt sometimes tends to call on reason. It may encourage people to hesitate before acting, and/or to apply more rigorous methods. Doubt may have particular importance as leading towards disbelief or non-acceptance.
Politics, ethics and law, faced with decisions that often determine the course of individual life, place great importance on doubt, and often foster elaborate adversarial processes to carefully sort through all available evidence in an attempt to come to a decision.
One view regards the scientific method, and to a degree all of science, as entirely motivated by doubt: rather than accepting existing theories, scientists express systematic or habitual doubt (skepticism) and devise experiments to test (and, optimally, to disprove) any theory. Some commentators see technology as simply the expansion of the experiments to a wider user-base, which takes real risks with it. Users may no longer doubt the applicability of the theory in play, but there remain doubts about how it interacts with the real world qua whole. The process of technology-transfer stages exploitation of science to ensure the minimization of doubt and danger.
Spirituality
Doubts are spiritual, mental, emotional, and sometimes physical barriers to a possible outcome and can be weak or strong. In a spiritual sense, doubt is resistance to energy flow. (Ohm vs Amp)
In the context of spirituality, individuals may see doubt as the opposite of faith. If faith represents a compulsion to follow a path, doubt may succeed in blocking that particular path. People use doubts and faith every day to choose the life path that they follow; for example: "I doubt that laziness will help me achieve my goals". Doubt can serve to create individual illusions to shield the vision of an unpleasant outcome. "I doubt anyone will catch me if I rob this store." Depending upon the energy put into the doubt, when used in this way, doubt itself may have little impact on events, merely blocking the individual from seeing possibilities.
Doubts can debase one's sense of spirituality: "I doubt the existence of the soul." On the other hand doubts can lead to the contemplation of spiritual issues if it is turned upon empiricism: "Why could there not be more to life than what can be proved?" While skeptical thinking (which relies on our ability to doubt) is often assumed to be at odds with spirituality it can also be turned inward on itself and preserve the possibility of spiritual belief.
Doubt is also used to create individual illusions to shield the vision of an unpleasant outcome. “I doubt anyone will catch me if I rob this store.” Depending upon the energy put into the doubt, when used in this way, doubt its self has little impact of events and merely blocked the individual from seeing possibilities.
According to some spiritual traditions, it is a form of fear. A doubtful internal disposition leads to the 'poisoning' of one's reality, the world where the mind resides. In other words, one's self is constrained and indeed damaged by such notions, as they often result in inactivity and harm to others.
To remove all doubt is to see all and be all powerful. Some doubts are inherit to the realm in which you live. To overcome such inherit doubts and limitations requires that the mind expand into other realms and dimensions, which are themselves guarded with doubt.
History
In some spiritual belief, doubt is considered to have been originally a good or at least useful entity, helping in observing mistaken views and heading one towards the desired correct answer. However, as it progressed, from being used as a marginal tool, it "implemented" itself more and more in the lives of people, gaining the power from the useful use of one time in one or even many years, to constant, daily, even a couple of times a day, use. Thus, it started oversaturating the human mind, and this is why most spiritualists recommend removing much or all traces of it, as its current effect far outweighs the initial usefulness it had when used in minor quantities.
Psychology
Psychoanalysts at times attribute doubt (which they may interpret as a symptom of a phobia emanating from the ego) to childhood, when the ego develops. Childhood experiences, these traditions maintain, can plant doubt about one's abilities and even about one's very identity — let alone doubt about the operations of the tooth fairy. The influence of parents and other influential figures often carries heavy connotations onto the resultant self-image of the child/ego, with doubts often included in such self-portrayals.
Cognitive mental as well as more spiritual approaches abound in response to the wide variety of potential causes for doubt — sometimes seen as a "Bad Thing". Behavioral therapy — in which a person systematically asks his own mind if the doubt has any real basis — uses rational, Socratic methods. Behavioral therapists claim that any constant confirmation leads to emotional detachment from the original doubt. This method contrasts to those of say, the Buddhist faith, which involve a more esoteric approach to doubt and inaction. Buddhism sees all doubt as a negative attachment to one's perceived past and future. To let go of the personal history of one's life (affirming this release every day in meditation) plays a central role in releasing the doubts — developed in and attached to — that history. Through much spiritual exertion, one can (if desired) dispel doubt, and live "only in the present".
Psychopathology
Psychopathology in general associates "excessive" doubt with obsessive-compulsive disorder, sometimes nicknamed a "disease of doubt".
Philosophy
Descartes employed Cartesian doubt as a pre-eminent methodological tool in his fundamental philosophical investigations. It has been suggestsed that Descartes' ideas in his Discourse on the Method may show the influence of the work of Al-Ghazali ("Algazel" to the West), whose method of doubting shares many similarities with Descartes' method.[2][3]
Anything that is questionable or causes doubt, especially an argument or a claim. Branches of philosophy like logic devote much effort to distinguish the dubious, the probable and the certain. Much of illogic rests on dubious assumptions, dubious data or dubious conclusions, with rhetoric, whitewashing, and deception playing their accustomed roles.
Religion
Doubt that god(s) exist may form the basis of agnosticism — possibly definable as the belief that one cannot determine the existence of god(s). It may also form or affect the basis of atheism, which can entail either not believing in god(s) or believing that no god(s) exist(s). On the other hand, doubt over God's nonexistence may lead to acceptance of a particular religion: compare Pascal's Pensées. By abbreviation, doubt as to the existence or intentions of the Christian God may relate to doubt concerning the Christian Bible as well, bringing into question its status in some circles as the word of God, and propounding alternative explanations (such as seeing it as a work of mythology like Homer's ancient Greek epics the Iliad and the Odyssey). Doubt of a specific religion brings into question the truth of that religion's set of beliefs. Alternatively, doubt as to some religious doctrines but the acceptance of others may lead to the growth of heresy and/or the splitting off of sects. Thus proto-Protestants doubted papal authority, and substituted alternative methods of governance in their new (but still recognizably similar) churches.
Christianity often debates doubt in the contexts of salvation and eventual redemption in an afterlife. This issue has become particularly important in the Protestant version of the Christian faith, which requires only acceptance of Jesus as saviour and intermediary with God for a positive outcome. The debate appears less important in most other religions and ethical traditions.
Doubt as a path towards (deeper) religious faith lies at the heart of the story of Saint Thomas the Apostle. Note in this respect the theological views of Georg Hermes:
... the starting-point and chief principle of every science, and hence of theology also, is not only methodical doubt, but positive doubt. One can believe only what one has perceived to be true from reasonable grounds, and consequently one must have the courage to continue doubting until one has found reliable grounds to satisfy the reason.[4]
Christian existentialists such as Søren Kierkegaard suggest that for one to truly have faith in God, one would also have to doubt one's beliefs about God; the doubt is the rational part of a person's thought involved in weighing evidence, without which the faith would have no real substance. Faith is not a decision based on evidence that, say, certain beliefs about God are true or a certain person is worthy of love. No such evidence could ever be enough to pragmatically justify the kind of total commitment involved in true religious faith or romantic love. Faith involves making that commitment anyway. Kierkegaard thought that to have faith is at the same time to have doubt.[5][6]
Doubt is the standard Dawkins mode of operation. In actuality it is all Richard Dawkins formulates. The human condition that closely resembles GOD and is the only scientific basis for original thought.
Law
Most criminal cases within an adversarial system require that the prosecution proves its contentions beyond a reasonable doubt — a doctrine also called the "Burden of Proof". This means that the State must present propositions which preclude "reasonable doubt" in the mind of a reasonable person as to the guilt of defendant. Some doubt may persist, but only to the extent that it would not affect a "reasonable person's" belief in the defendant's guilt. If the doubt raised does affect a "reasonable person's" belief, the jury is not satisfied beyond a "reasonable doubt". The jurisprudence of the applicable jurisdiction usually defines the precise meaning of words such as "reasonable" and "doubt" for such purposes.
See also
- Reasonable doubt
- Doubting Thomas
- FUD
- List of ethics topics
- Methodic doubt
- Philosophical skepticism
- Question
- Satire (which may arouse doubts)
- Skepticism
- The realm of possibility
References
| This page uses content from Wikipedia. The original article was at Doubt. The list of authors can be seen in the page history. The text of this Wikinfo article is available under the GNU Free Documentation License and the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license. |
Notes
- ^
See for example: Sharpe, Alfred. "Doubt". The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 5 (New York: Robert Appleton). http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05141a.htm. Retrieved on 2008-10-21. "A state in which the mind is suspended between two contradictory propositions and unable to assent to either of them."
- ^ Najm, Sami M. (July-October 1966), "The Place and Function of Doubt in the Philosophies of Descartes and Al-Ghazali", Philosophy East and West 16 (3-4): 133–41
- ^ George Henry Lewes, The Biographical History of Philosophy from Its Origin in Greece Down to the Present Day Part Two, New York: D. Appleton and Company, p. 863
- ^ Schulte, Karl Joseph (1910). "George Hermes". The Catholic Encyclopedia 7. New York: Robert Appleton. Retrieved on 2008-10-21.
- ^ Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, ed. by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, v. 1, Princeton University Press, 1992, pp. 21–57
- ^ Soren Kierkegaard's Journals and Papers, trans. Hong and Malantschuk, p.399.
Bibliography
- Hecht, Jennifer Michael (2003). Doubt: a history: the great doubters and their legacy of innovation from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 0-06-009795-7. This book traces the role of doubt through human history, all over the world, particularly regarding religion.
- Hein, David (Winter 2006). "Faith and Doubt in Rose Macaulay's The Towers of Trebizond". Anglican Theological Review 88 (1): 47-68. ISSN 0003-3286.

