Existential fallacy

From Wikinfo

Jump to: navigation, search

The existential fallacy, or existential instantiation, is a logical fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because it has two universal premises and a particular conclusion. In other words, for the conclusion to be true, at least one member of the class must exist, but the premises do not establish this.

Example:

  • All inhabitants of other planets are friendly, and Martians are inhabitants of another planet. Therefore, Martians are friendly. (The conclusion assumes there really are some Martians in existence.)
  • All unicorns are animals, therefore some animals are unicorns. (This conclusion assumes that unicorns exist.)

The existential fallacy is a syllogistic fallacy. Modern logical constructs, however, allow for conditional logic ("If unicorns existed...")

See also

External links

This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, which is licensed under the GFDL.Template:Logic-stub

This page uses content from Wikipedia. The original article was at Existential fallacy.
The list of authors can be seen in the page history. The text of this Wikinfo article is available under the GNU Free Documentation License and the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license.

English | Română | edit

In other languages