Kafala system

From WWTrade
Revision as of 20:39, 7 July 2013 by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The '''kafala system''' (sponsorship system) is a system used to monitor the construction and domestic migrant laborers in the Arab States of the Persian Gulf.<ref nam...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The kafala system (sponsorship system) is a system used to monitor the construction and domestic migrant laborers in the Arab States of the Persian Gulf.[1] The system requires all unskilled laborers to have an in-country sponsor, usually their employer, who is responsible for their visa and legal status. This practice has been criticised by human rights organizations for creating easy opportunities for the exploitation of workers, as many employers take away passports and abuse their workers with little chance of legal repercussions.[2][3]

Bahrain's repeal of the kafala system

In 2008, Bahrain was the first country in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) to claim to repeal the kafala system. In a public statement the Labor Minister likened the system to slavery.[2] Changes to the Labour Market Regulatory Suggestion were made in April 2009 and implemented starting 1 August 2009. Under the new law, migrants are sponsored by the Labour Market Regulation Authority and can change from one employer and etc. to another without their employer's agreement. Three months' notice is required to quit from an employee.[4] In November 2009, Human Rights Watch (HRW) stated that "authorities do little to enforce compliance" with "employers who withhold wages and passports from migrant employees accountable, ... practices [which] are legal under Bahraini law."[5]

According to a 2008 HRW report,[6] under the kafala system in Saudi Arabia, "an employer assumes responsibility for a hired migrant worker and must grant explicit permission before the worker can enter Saudi Arabia, transfer employment, or leave the country. The kafala system gives the employer immense control over the worker."[1] HRW stated that "some abusive employers exploit the kafala system and force domestic workers to continue working against their will and forbid them from returning to their countries of origin" and that this is "incompatible with Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights".[1]

HRW stated that "the combination of the high recruitment fees paid by Saudi employers and the power granted them by the kafala system to control whether a worker can change employers or exit the country made some employers feel entitled to exert 'ownership' over a domestic worker" and that the "sense of ownership ... creates slavery-like conditions".


About 1.2 million foreign workers in Qatar, mostly from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines, make up 94 percent of the labor force. There are nearly five foreign workers for each Qatari citizen, mostly housemaids and low-skilled workers.

Most of the workers labor under near-feudal conditions that Human Rights Watch has likened to "forced labor".[3] Sharan Burrow, General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation, stated "In late 2010 we conducted a risk assessment looking at basic fundamental labor rights. The Gulf region stood out like a red light. They were absolutely at the bottom end for rights for workers. They were fundamentally slave states."[3] An exit visa system prevents workers from leaving the country without the sponsor's permission.[3] Employer consent is required to change jobs, leave the country, get a driver's license, rent a home or open a checking account. A person who visited Qatar described their situation: "Foreign workers in Qatar are modern-day slaves to their local employers. The local Qatari owns you."[7]


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 "'As If I Am Not Human' — Abuses against Asian Domestic Workers in Saudi Arabia (pdf)" (PDF). Human Rights Watch. 2008-07-08. Archived from the original on 2012-07-23. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/saudiarabia0708_1.pdf. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Harmassi, Mohammed (6 May 2009). "Bahrain to end 'slavery' system". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8035972.stm.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Montague, James (1 May 2013). "Desert heat: World Cup hosts Qatar face scrutiny over 'slavery' accusations". CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/30/sport/football/football-qatar-world-cup-2022-worker-rights.
  4. "Three months after the Sponsorship system in Bahrain was 'scrapped', what really changed?". Migrant Rights. 2009-11-11. Archived from the original on 2012-07-23. http://www.migrant-rights.org/2009/11/11/three-months-after-the-sponsorship-system-in-bahrain-was-scrapped-what-really-changed/. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  5. "Bahrain: Migrant Workers Denied Pay, Right to Travel". Human Rights Watch. 2009-11-04. Archived from the original on 2012-07-23. http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/11/04/bahrain-migrant-workers-denied-pay-right-travel. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  6. "'As If I Am Not Human' — Abuses against Asian Domestic Workers in Saudi Arabia". Human Rights Watch. 2008-07-08. Archived from the original on 2012-07-23. http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2008/07/07/if-i-am-not-human. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  7. Morin, Richard (April 12, 2013). "Indentured Servitude in the Persian Gulf". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/sunday-review/indentured-servitude-in-the-persian-gulf.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0&hpw. Retrieved 17 April 2013.
A portion of this material is imported from Wikipedia. The original publication was at Kafala system.
The list of authors can be seen in the page history. The source code of this template is available under the GNU Free Documentation License and the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license.